Decline Curve Analysis Overview
Introduction
Decline Curve Analysis (DCA) is the primary method for forecasting well and field production, estimating reserves, and calculating economic metrics. By fitting mathematical models to historical rate-time data, engineers can project future performance and ultimate recovery.
Petroleum Office provides a comprehensive suite of decline models covering both conventional and unconventional reservoirs.
When to Use Decline Curve Analysis
DCA is appropriate when:
- Boundary-dominated flow has been established
- Historical production data shows consistent decline behavior
- Reservoir simulation is impractical or unnecessary
- Quick reserves estimates are needed for economic evaluation
DCA may be insufficient when:
- Flow regimes are still transient (early-time data)
- Significant operational changes affect production
- Complex reservoir heterogeneity dominates behavior
Model Selection Guide
Decision Framework
Start Here
│
▼
┌───────────────────────┐
│ Reservoir Type? │
└───────────────────────┘
│ │
Conventional Unconventional
│ │
▼ ▼
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐
│ Arps │ │ Flow Regime? │
│ Models │ └──────────────────┘
└──────────┘ │ │
│ Transient BDF
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐
│b-value?│ │ Duong │ │ PLE or │
└────────┘ │ or │ │ SEPD │
│ │ PLE │ └────────┘
┌────────┼────────┐└────────┘
│ │ │
b=0 0<b{`<`}1 b>1
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Exponential Hyperbolic Use
Modified
Hyperbolic
Quick Reference Table
| Reservoir Type | Flow Regime | Recommended Model | Documentation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional | BDF, b ≈ 0 | Exponential | Arps Decline |
| Conventional | BDF, 0 < b < 1 | Hyperbolic | Arps Decline |
| Conventional | BDF, b = 1 | Harmonic | Arps Decline |
| Conventional | BDF, b > 1 | Modified Hyperbolic | Modified Hyperbolic |
| Unconventional | Transient/Linear | PLE or Duong | PLE, Duong |
| Unconventional | BDF transition | SEPD | SEPD |
| Unconventional | Late BDF | Modified Hyperbolic | Modified Hyperbolic |
Available Decline Models
Arps Decline (1945)
The foundational decline model for conventional reservoirs operating under boundary-dominated flow.
Three Forms:
- Exponential (b = 0): Constant decline rate, most conservative
- Hyperbolic (0 < b < 1): Declining decline rate, most common
- Harmonic (b = 1): Special case of hyperbolic
Best For:
- Conventional oil and gas reservoirs
- Wells with established boundary-dominated flow
- Primary and secondary recovery
Limitations:
- Hyperbolic with b > 1 gives infinite EUR
- Not suitable for transient flow periods
📖 Full Documentation: Arps Decline Models
Modified Hyperbolic Decline
Addresses the infinite EUR problem by transitioning from hyperbolic to exponential decline at a specified terminal decline rate.
Key Concept:
- Follows hyperbolic decline until
- Transitions to exponential decline thereafter
- Gives finite, realistic EUR values
Best For:
- Conventional reservoirs with b ≥ 1
- Long-term forecasts requiring bounded EUR
- Economic limit calculations
📖 Full Documentation: Modified Hyperbolic Decline
Power Law Exponential (PLE)
Designed for unconventional reservoirs exhibiting power-law decline behavior during extended transient flow.
Rate Equation:
Best For:
- Tight gas and shale reservoirs
- Hydraulically fractured horizontal wells
- Extended transient (linear) flow periods
Advantages:
- Captures early steep decline
- Bounded EUR (includes term)
- Flexible shape parameter n
📖 Full Documentation: Power Law Exponential Decline
Stretched Exponential (SEPD)
A probabilistic model treating drainage as a statistical distribution of characteristic times.
Rate Equation:
Best For:
- Unconventional reservoirs with heterogeneous drainage
- Wells with gradual transition to BDF
- Probabilistic reserves estimation
Advantages:
- Captures late-time BDF behavior
- Finite EUR without artificial constraints
- Physically meaningful parameters
📖 Full Documentation: Stretched Exponential Decline
Duong Decline
Empirically derived for fracture-dominated flow in unconventional reservoirs.
Rate Equation:
Best For:
- Shale oil and gas wells
- Early production dominated by fracture flow
- Wells with distinct linear flow signature
Advantages:
- Excellent fit to early unconventional data
- Captures characteristic concave-up log-log behavior
- Two-parameter simplicity
📖 Full Documentation: Duong Decline Model
Model Comparison
Decline Behavior Visualization
log(q)
│
│╲
│ ╲╲ Duong (steep early decline)
│ ╲ ╲╲
│ ╲ ╲╲___ PLE (power-law transition)
│ ╲ ╲ ╲___
│ ╲ ╲ ╲___ Hyperbolic
│ ╲ ╲ ╲___
│ ╲ ╲ ╲ Exponential
│ ╲ ╲ ╲
└─────────────────────────────→ log(t)
EUR Comparison for Same Early Data
| Model | EUR Behavior | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Exponential | Most conservative | Under-estimation |
| Hyperbolic (b < 1) | Moderate | Reasonable |
| Hyperbolic (b ≥ 1) | Infinite | Over-estimation |
| Modified Hyperbolic | Bounded | Depends on |
| PLE | Bounded | Parameter sensitivity |
| SEPD | Bounded | Depends on τ and n |
| Duong | Can be unbounded | Over-estimation risk |
Practical Workflow
Step 1: Data Preparation
- Gather rate-time data (monthly or daily)
- Normalize for operational effects (choke changes, workovers)
- Identify flow regime from diagnostic plots
Step 2: Model Selection
- Determine reservoir type (conventional vs. unconventional)
- Assess flow regime (transient vs. BDF)
- Select appropriate model(s) from table above
Step 3: Parameter Estimation
Use fitting functions to determine model parameters:
- Rate functions for point estimates
- Cumulative functions for material balance checks
- Weighted fitting for emphasis on recent data
Step 4: Forecast and EUR
- Generate rate forecast to economic limit
- Calculate cumulative production (EUR)
- Validate with volumetric or simulation estimates
- Assess uncertainty with multiple scenarios
Function Categories
Rate Calculations
Calculate instantaneous production rate at any time.
Cumulative Calculations
Calculate total production from time zero to any point.
EUR Calculations
Calculate ultimate recovery to economic limit or infinite time.
Time Calculations
Determine time to reach a specific rate or cumulative volume.
Parameter Fitting
Estimate model parameters from historical data.
Related Documentation
Detailed Model Theory
- Arps Decline Models — Exponential, hyperbolic, harmonic
- Modified Hyperbolic Decline — Terminal decline transition
- Power Law Exponential — PLE for unconventional
- Stretched Exponential — SEPD probabilistic model
- Duong Decline — Fracture-dominated flow
Supporting Functions
- Interpolation Functions — For data processing
- Unit Conversions — Rate unit handling
References
-
Arps, J.J. (1945). "Analysis of Decline Curves." Transactions of the AIME, 160(1), pp. 228-247.
-
Ilk, D., Rushing, J.A., Perego, A.D., and Blasingame, T.A. (2008). "Exponential vs. Hyperbolic Decline in Tight Gas Sands." SPE-116731-MS.
-
Valko, P.P. and Lee, W.J. (2010). "A Better Way to Forecast Production from Unconventional Gas Wells." SPE-134231-MS.
-
Duong, A.N. (2011). "Rate-Decline Analysis for Fracture-Dominated Shale Reservoirs." SPE-137748-PA.
-
Fetkovich, M.J. (1980). "Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 32(6), pp. 1065-1077.