Bubble Point Pressure Correlations
Overview
The bubble point pressure () is the pressure at which the first bubble of gas evolves from an oil at reservoir temperature. This thermodynamic property is fundamental to reservoir characterization:
- Phase behavior prediction β distinguishes undersaturated from saturated flow conditions
- Material balance calculations β determines oil compressibility above versus below
- Production forecasting β gas evolution affects mobility ratios and recovery
- Facilities design β separator sizing requires saturation pressure knowledge
When laboratory PVT data are unavailable, engineers rely on empirical correlations derived from regression analysis of measured datasets.
Physical Significance
At the bubble point:
- Reservoir oil transitions from a single-phase liquid to a two-phase gas-liquid system
- Solution gas begins evolving from the oil phase
- Oil compressibility changes discontinuously
- Formation volume factor reaches its maximum value ()
The bubble point pressure depends on:
| Property | Effect on |
|---|---|
| Solution gas-oil ratio () | Higher β higher |
| Gas specific gravity () | Higher β higher |
| Oil API gravity () | Higher API β lower |
| Temperature () | Higher β higher |
Correlation Equations
All correlations covered here solve the inverse problem: given measured , , , and , calculate .
Standing (1947)
The earliest widely-used correlation, developed from 105 California crude oil samples:
Where:
- = bubble point pressure, psia
- = solution gas-oil ratio, scf/STB
- = gas specific gravity (air = 1.0)
- = oil API gravity, Β°API
- = temperature, Β°F
Applicability Range:
| Parameter | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|
| 0.59 | 0.95 | |
| 16.5 | 63.8 | |
| 20 | 1,425 scf/STB | |
| 100 | 258 Β°F | |
| 130 | 7,000 psia |
Vasquez and Beggs (1980)
Developed from over 5,000 data points with API gravity-dependent coefficients:
Coefficients:
| API Range | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0362 | 1.0937 | 25.724 | |
| 0.0178 | 1.187 | 23.931 |
Where:
- = temperature, Β°F (converted to Β°R with +459.67)
Applicability Range:
| Parameter | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|
| 0.511 | 1.351 | |
| 15.3 | 59.5 | |
| 10 | 5,000 scf/STB | |
| 60 | 300 Β°F | |
| 200 | 6,000 psia |
GlasΓΈ (1980)
Developed from 45 North Sea crude oil samples using a correlation factor :
Applicability Range:
| Parameter | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | 1.276 | |
| 22.3 | 48.1 | |
| 90 | 2,637 scf/STB | |
| 80 | 280 Β°F | |
| 165 | 7,142 psia |
Al-Marhoun (1988)
Developed from 160 Middle East crude oil samples:
Where:
- = oil specific gravity =
- = temperature, Β°F (converted to Β°R with +460)
Applicability Range:
| Parameter | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|
| 0.752 | 1.367 | |
| 19.4 | 44.6 | |
| 26 | 1,602 scf/STB | |
| 74 | 240 Β°F | |
| 130 | 3,573 psia |
Petrosky and Farshad (1993)
Developed from Gulf of Mexico crude oil samples:
Applicability Range:
| Parameter | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|
| 0.752 | 1.367 | |
| 19.4 | 44.6 | |
| 26 | 1,602 scf/STB | |
| 74 | 240 Β°F | |
| 130 | 3,573 psia |
Dokla and Osman (1992)
Developed from UAE crude oil samples:
Where:
- = oil specific gravity =
Applicability Range:
| Parameter | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|
| 0.752 | 1.367 | |
| 19.4 | 44.6 | |
| 26 | 1,602 scf/STB | |
| 74 | 240 Β°F | |
| 130 | 3,573 psia |
Dindoruk and Christman (2004)
Developed from Gulf of Mexico deepwater crude oils using complex regression:
Coefficients:
| Coefficient | Value |
|---|---|
| 2.844591797 | |
| 1.225226436 | |
| 0.033383304 | |
| β0.272945957 | |
| β0.084226069 | |
| 1.869979257 | |
| 1.221486524 | |
| 1.370508349 | |
| 0.011688308 |
Applicability Range:
| Parameter | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|
| 0.6017 | 1.0270 | |
| 14.7 | 40.0 | |
| 133 | 3,050 scf/STB | |
| 117 | 276 Β°F | |
| 926 | 12,230 psia |
Functions Covered
The following functions implement these bubble point correlations. See each function page for detailed parameter definitions, Excel syntax, and usage examples.
| Function | Correlation | Regional Basis |
|---|---|---|
| PboStanding | Standing (1947) | California |
| PboVasquezBeggs | Vasquez-Beggs (1980) | Multiple regions |
| PboGlaso | GlasΓΈ (1980) | North Sea |
| PboAlMarhoun | Al-Marhoun (1988) | Middle East |
| PboPetroskyFarshad | Petrosky-Farshad (1993) | Gulf of Mexico |
| PboDindorukChristman | Dindoruk-Christman (2004) | Deepwater GOM |
| PboDoklaOsman | Dokla-Osman (1992) | UAE |
Correlation Selection Guidelines
By Region
| Oil Source | Recommended Correlation |
|---|---|
| California | Standing (1947) |
| North Sea | GlasΓΈ (1980) |
| Middle East | Al-Marhoun (1988) |
| Gulf of Mexico (shelf) | Vasquez-Beggs (1980) or Petrosky-Farshad (1993) |
| Deepwater GOM | Dindoruk-Christman (2004) |
| UAE | Dokla-Osman (1992) |
By Fluid Properties
| Fluid Characteristic | Recommended Correlation |
|---|---|
| Low GOR () | Standing, Al-Marhoun |
| High GOR () | Dindoruk-Christman, Vasquez-Beggs |
| Light oil () | Standing, GlasΓΈ |
| Heavy/Medium oil () | Vasquez-Beggs, Al-Marhoun |
| High-pressure reservoir | Dindoruk-Christman |
Statistical Performance
Based on the Brazilian Campos Basin study comparing 20 correlations:
| Correlation | AARE (%) | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Vasquez-Beggs | 7-12 | General-purpose |
| Al-Marhoun | 8-15 | Middle East analogs |
| Standing | 10-18 | Light California-type oils |
| GlasΓΈ | 12-20 | North Sea analogs |
Note: Statistical performance varies significantly by dataset. Regional correlations typically outperform global correlations when applied to their development region.
Related Documentation
- Solution Gas-Oil Ratio (Rs) β input parameter for Pb correlations
- Oil Formation Volume Factor (Bo) β property at bubble point
- Oil Viscosity Correlations β ΞΌo above and below bubble point
- PVT Properties Overview β correlation selection strategy
References
-
Standing, M.B. (1947). "A Pressure-Volume-Temperature Correlation for Mixtures of California Oils and Gases." Drilling and Production Practice, API, pp. 275-287.
-
Vazquez, M. and Beggs, H.D. (1980). "Correlations for Fluid Physical Property Prediction." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 32(6), pp. 968-970.
-
GlasΓΈ, Γ. (1980). "Generalized Pressure-Volume-Temperature Correlations." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 32(5), pp. 785-795.
-
Al-Marhoun, M.A. (1988). "PVT Correlations for Middle East Crude Oils." Journal of Petroleum Technology, 40(5), pp. 650-666.
-
Petrosky, G.E. and Farshad, F.F. (1993). "Pressure-Volume-Temperature Correlations for Gulf of Mexico Crude Oils." SPE Reservoir Engineering, 8(4), pp. 416-420.
-
Dokla, M.E. and Osman, M.E. (1992). "Correlation of PVT Properties for UAE Crudes." SPE Formation Evaluation, 7(1), pp. 41-46.
-
Dindoruk, B. and Christman, P.G. (2004). "PVT Properties and Viscosity Correlations for Gulf of Mexico Oils." SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 7(6), pp. 427-437.
-
Santos, R.G., Silva, J.A., Mehl, A., and Experiment, P.E. (2019). "Comparison of PVT Correlations with PVT Laboratory Data from the Brazilian Campos Basin." Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas, 13(3), pp. 129-157.